Search data shows how readers find your site. It does not tell the assistant everything a page says or prove that a rewrite will help. These prompts move from query evidence to a focused editorial review. Supply page text yourself when you want feedback on the actual wording.
Start with striking distance queries, content decay and cannibalization checks for the underlying methods.
Find opportunities in existing visibility
Find my striking distance queries for the last 28 days. Sort by impressions and include clicks, CTR and average position for each candidate.
Returns queries at average positions 11–20 for a focused content review.
For the five most visible striking distance queries, show the landing pages receiving impressions. Flag cases where more than one page appears.
Returns candidate pages and shared visibility before you assign an update.
Show the highest-impression queries for this page over the last 28 days. Group related wording, but keep the original query rows visible.
Returns search language you can compare with the page’s actual coverage.
Compare this page’s query performance by mobile and desktop. Show differences worth checking before I change the page’s content or layout.
Returns device context without assuming that every difference is a content gap.
Review declining and overlapping pages
Find pages losing the most clicks over the last 28 days versus the previous 28. Show both click totals and the absolute loss.
Returns decay candidates, excluding pages with fewer than 10 earlier clicks.
For the largest declining page, compare query impressions, clicks, CTR and position. Explain which observations suggest a demand or visibility check.
Returns evidence for choosing a review rather than prescribing a rewrite.
Find queries where two or more pages each receive at least 10% of impressions. Show the URLs and each page’s share.
Returns overlap candidates that need an intent check before any merge.
For this overlapping query, compare each page’s performance across two equal periods. Identify observations that could justify reviewing their distinct purposes.
Returns a comparison to pair with your own reading of both pages.
Turn evidence into an editorial brief
Using the query data and page text I paste below, identify useful questions the page does not answer. Separate evidence from editorial suggestions.
Returns a draft gap review grounded in supplied text and query data.
Using these two page excerpts and their shared queries, suggest how to clarify each page’s purpose. Explain what I should review before merging.
Returns options for separating intent without assuming consolidation is required.
Draft an update brief for this selected page using our findings. Include the reader question, supporting query evidence and changes for me to review.
Returns a practical editorial brief; mowteng does not edit site pages.
After my update, compare these two equal date ranges for the page and its main queries. State changes without claiming the edit caused them.
Returns a follow-up measurement that keeps causation separate from timing.
Use the answers carefully
Prioritize by reader value as well as impressions. A high-volume query may be irrelevant to your product, and two pages ranking for one query may serve different needs. Record what you changed and when. Use comparable periods to assess later movement instead of judging an update from a single day.